US v. Caronia: Related Resources

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision on United States vs. Caronia raises a big question for the pharmaceutical industry: will the decision have broader applicability to comparative effectiveness research (CER) and other health-related studies?

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision on United States vs. Caronia raises a big question for the pharmaceutical industry: will the decision have broader applicability to comparative effectiveness research (CER) and other health-related studies?

At issue in Caronia was whether the First Amendment protects the right of individuals to speak truthfully about off-label uses of Food and Drug Administration-approved products. In its decision, the Court vacated the criminal conviction of a pharmaceutical sales representative who promoted an off-label use of the narcolepsy drug Xyrem. The sales representative, Alfred Caronia, had argued the conviction infringed on his First Amendment rights. Thus, the Court determined that industry and its employees may be able to promote off-label uses of drugs, provided the information shared is factual.

How is this case being interpreted by legal experts and policymakers? To answer that question, we pulled together some recent analyses and articles from a variety of sources.**

**Please note that this is not a comprehensive list; this information is not intended as legal advice; and the opinions expressed are for informational purposes and do not necessarily reflect NPC’s views.